Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CHWY is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCHWYVIPS
Company NameChewy, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization16.27 billion USD8.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2019March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIPS
5-Day Price Return10.08%8.20%
13-Week Price Return-0.18%10.54%
26-Week Price Return1.89%7.49%
52-Week Price Return66.01%16.61%
Month-to-Date Return7.38%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return17.68%21.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.67M2.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.02M3.43M
3-Month Volatility40.27%33.51%
Beta1.630.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

115.27%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

CHWY’s Return on Equity of 115.27% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

3.21%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 3.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.03%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)115.27%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.80%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.21%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.03%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.24%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.80

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.801.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.381.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.00150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

42.06

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

A P/E Ratio of 42.06 places CHWY in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VIPS

7.88

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.35

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.54

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

41.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 41.64, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CHWY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.067.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.350.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.641.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.41--