Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. VIK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and VIK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHWYVIK
Company NameChewy, Inc.Viking Holdings Ltd
CountryUnited StatesBermuda
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization16.08 billion USD26.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2019May 1, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and VIK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. VIK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIK
5-Day Price Return8.16%3.24%
13-Week Price Return-5.09%16.64%
26-Week Price Return21.65%49.67%
52-Week Price Return35.01%77.85%
Month-to-Date Return-1.25%-2.29%
Year-to-Date Return20.78%41.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.30M2.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.76M2.98M
3-Month Volatility50.56%23.15%
Beta1.681.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

48.34%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Return on Equity of 48.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.22%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 1.22% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.32%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.32% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

VIK’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIK
Return on Equity (TTM)48.34%--
Return on Assets (TTM)4.97%7.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.22%14.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.32%21.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.45%42.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.81

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.810.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.370.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0020.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.001.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. VIK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

108.97

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

At 108.97, CHWY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIK

32.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 32.52 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.33

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIK

4.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.62 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

37.94

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

At 37.94, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHWY vs. VIK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYVIK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)108.9732.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.334.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)37.9484.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.5718.90