Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHWYTPR
Company NameChewy, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization15.57 billion USD23.79 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2019October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYTPR
5-Day Price Return-6.03%3.10%
13-Week Price Return-9.11%27.41%
26-Week Price Return15.44%63.22%
52-Week Price Return30.18%150.81%
Month-to-Date Return-7.22%1.50%
Year-to-Date Return12.06%75.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.66M2.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.78M3.89M
3-Month Volatility51.20%44.26%
Beta1.601.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

48.34%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Return on Equity of 48.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.22%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 1.22% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.32%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.32% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)48.34%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.97%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.22%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.32%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.45%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.81

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.811.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.371.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.002.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.003.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.24%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

103.43

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

At 103.43, CHWY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TPR

131.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 131.88, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.27

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

3.45

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.45 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

37.94

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

At 37.94, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHWY vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)103.43131.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.273.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)37.9421.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.7622.58