Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. QSR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and QSR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHWYQSR
Company NameChewy, Inc.Restaurant Brands International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization16.27 billion USD29.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2019December 11, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and QSR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. QSR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYQSR
5-Day Price Return10.08%0.69%
13-Week Price Return-0.18%-4.75%
26-Week Price Return1.89%2.23%
52-Week Price Return66.01%-6.15%
Month-to-Date Return7.38%-3.45%
Year-to-Date Return17.68%0.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.67M2.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.02M2.73M
3-Month Volatility40.27%22.22%
Beta1.630.67

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

115.27%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

CHWY’s Return on Equity of 115.27% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

QSR

30.33%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

QSR’s Return on Equity of 30.33% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

3.21%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 3.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QSR

10.82%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

QSR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.03%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

QSR

25.95%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.95% places QSR in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYQSR
Return on Equity (TTM)115.27%30.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.80%3.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.21%10.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.03%25.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.24%56.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.80

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QSR

0.96

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

QSR’s Current Ratio of 0.96 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QSR

4.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

QSR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.47 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QSR

5.11

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

QSR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYQSR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.800.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.004.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.005.11

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. QSR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. QSR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QSR

3.55%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.55%, QSR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QSR

110.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QSR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 110.11% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYQSR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%110.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

42.06

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

A P/E Ratio of 42.06 places CHWY in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QSR

31.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

QSR’s P/E Ratio of 31.03 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.35

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QSR

3.36

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

QSR’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

41.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 41.64, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QSR

6.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

QSR’s P/B Ratio of 6.95 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHWY vs. QSR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYQSR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.0631.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.353.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.646.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.4122.64