Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHWYMGA
Company NameChewy, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization15.57 billion USD13.82 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 14, 2019October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMGA
5-Day Price Return-6.03%4.20%
13-Week Price Return-9.11%19.32%
26-Week Price Return15.44%38.99%
52-Week Price Return30.18%21.48%
Month-to-Date Return-7.22%2.65%
Year-to-Date Return12.06%12.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.66M1.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.78M1.15M
3-Month Volatility51.20%25.49%
Beta1.601.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

48.34%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Return on Equity of 48.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.22%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 1.22% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.32%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.32% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)48.34%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.97%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.22%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.32%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.45%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.81

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.811.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.370.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.008.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

3.98%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.98%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

103.43

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

At 103.43, CHWY’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGA

11.27

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.27 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.27

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

37.94

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

At 37.94, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHWY vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)103.4311.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.270.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)37.940.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.767.45