Seek Returns logo

CHWY vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHWY and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHWYMBLY
Company NameChewy, Inc.Mobileye Global Inc.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization16.27 billion USD11.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 14, 2019October 26, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHWY and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHWY vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMBLY
5-Day Price Return10.08%1.93%
13-Week Price Return-0.18%-14.21%
26-Week Price Return1.89%-13.43%
52-Week Price Return66.01%-2.40%
Month-to-Date Return7.38%0.07%
Year-to-Date Return17.68%-28.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.67M5.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.02M5.57M
3-Month Volatility40.27%51.78%
Beta1.630.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHWY

115.27%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

CHWY’s Return on Equity of 115.27% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

3.21%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

CHWY’s Net Profit Margin of 3.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHWY

1.03%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

CHWY’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)115.27%-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.80%-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.21%-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.03%-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.24%48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.80

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

CHWY’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CHWY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

-36.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

CHWY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -36.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.806.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.385.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-36.00-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHWY vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHWY vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHWY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

42.06

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

A P/E Ratio of 42.06 places CHWY in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHWY

1.35

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

CHWY’s P/S Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

6.10

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 6.10, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHWY

41.64

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 41.64, CHWY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHWY vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHWYMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.06--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.356.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.641.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.4119.87