Seek Returns logo

CHTR vs. LYV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHTR and LYV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHTRLYV
Company NameCharter Communications, Inc.Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryMediaEntertainment
Market Capitalization28.11 billion USD31.16 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 5, 2010December 21, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHTR and LYV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHTR vs. LYV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHTRLYV
5-Day Price Return-3.49%-5.23%
13-Week Price Return-24.16%-15.58%
26-Week Price Return-50.60%-4.99%
52-Week Price Return-50.00%6.96%
Month-to-Date Return-13.15%-9.14%
Year-to-Date Return-40.75%4.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.96M4.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.13M2.52M
3-Month Volatility30.33%29.75%
Beta1.091.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHTR

33.19%

Media Industry

Max
33.19%
Q3
16.27%
Median
10.95%
Q1
4.58%
Min
-3.13%

In the upper quartile for the Media industry, CHTR’s Return on Equity of 33.19% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYV

309.84%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 309.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHTR

9.54%

Media Industry

Max
20.69%
Q3
12.32%
Median
6.50%
Q1
2.54%
Min
-4.90%

CHTR’s Net Profit Margin of 9.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Media industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LYV

3.66%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHTR

23.84%

Media Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
13.69%
Median
9.11%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-6.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.84% places CHTR in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LYV

4.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.69% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHTRLYV
Return on Equity (TTM)33.19%309.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.47%4.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.54%3.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.84%4.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.06%25.14%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHTR

0.37

Media Industry

Max
3.59
Q3
2.01
Median
1.08
Q1
0.82
Min
0.24

CHTR’s Current Ratio of 0.37 falls into the lower quartile for the Media industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LYV

0.92

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHTR

6.33

Media Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.08
Median
0.55
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.33, CHTR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Media industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LYV

14.11

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 14.11, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHTR

2.34

Media Industry

Max
44.57
Q3
24.75
Median
4.58
Q1
2.20
Min
-10.82

CHTR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Media industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHTRLYV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.370.92
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.320.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)6.3314.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.344.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHTR vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHTR vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHTR

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.91%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHTR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHTR

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
165.03%
Q3
102.15%
Median
45.64%
Q1
13.96%
Min
0.00%

CHTR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHTRLYV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHTR

10.17

Media Industry

Max
49.10
Q3
32.11
Median
14.41
Q1
12.15
Min
4.42

In the lower quartile for the Media industry, CHTR’s P/E Ratio of 10.17 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LYV

35.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 35.09 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHTR

0.97

Media Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.46
Median
1.16
Q1
0.86
Min
0.20

CHTR’s P/S Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYV

1.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHTR

2.45

Media Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
2.57
Median
1.75
Q1
1.06
Min
0.56

CHTR’s P/B Ratio of 2.45 is within the conventional range for the Media industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYV

73.49

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

At 73.49, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHTR vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHTRLYV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.1735.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.971.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4573.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.1814.09