Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. EchoStar (SATS)

Company Profile

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) and EchoStar (SATS) both belong to the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, though CHT is classified under Integrated Telecommunication Services while SATS falls under Alternative Carriers.

EchoStar (SATS) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Historical Performance

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. EchoStar (SATS) has a more conventional positive beta of 0.97.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Profitability

EchoStar (SATS) reports a negative Return on Equity (TTM) of -110.54%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 10.15%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EchoStar (SATS) reports a negative Net Profit Margin (TTM) of -96.62%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 16.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EchoStar (SATS) reports a negative Operating Profit Margin (TTM) of -117.37%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 20.45%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability at a Glance

Financial Strength

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 1.49 keeps Current Ratio (MRQ) within its industry mid-range, while EchoStar (SATS) at 0.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SATS.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 0.10 maintains Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) in the lower-leverage quartile, while EchoStar (SATS) at 4.51 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

EchoStar (SATS) reports a problematic Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of -13.71; operating income or EBIT does not fully cover interest expense, so the ratio points to interest-payment strain. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 166.33, ranking against industry peers normally.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Dividend

EchoStar (SATS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — often a deliberate choice to reinvest earnings rather than return cash. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports a yield of 3.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports an unusual Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) of 410.88% — outside the typical 0–100% range; EchoStar (SATS) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend at a Glance

Valuation

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) of 27.23 and can be ranked against industry peers; EchoStar (SATS) has no value available for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

EchoStar (SATS) at 2.61 sits in the higher-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), but Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 4.42 is higher still, above its industry benchmark range — both carry elevated trailing revenue multiples relative to peers, with CHT higher.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 2.63 carries typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while EchoStar (SATS) at 5.43 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — SATS carries a higher book-value multiple relative to peers.

Valuation at a Glance