CHT vs. LYV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CHT and LYV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CHT trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LYV is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	CHT	LYV
Company Name	Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.	Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
Country	Taiwan	United States
GICS Sector	Communication Services	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Diversified Telecommunication Services	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	34.89 billion USD	36.85 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 18, 2003	December 21, 2005
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHT and LYV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHT vs. LYV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CHT	LYV
5-Day Price Return	1.51%	7.15%
13-Week Price Return	3.86%	12.81%
26-Week Price Return	6.75%	5.92%
52-Week Price Return	8.26%	73.44%
Month-to-Date Return	4.26%	7.56%
Year-to-Date Return	8.91%	22.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume	9.92M	2.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume	11.99M	2.52M
3-Month Volatility	12.54%	25.50%
Beta	-0.07	1.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHT

9.91%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 35.96%
Q3: 14.90%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: -0.99%
Min: -18.19%

CHT’s Return on Equity of 9.91% is on par with the norm for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LYV

357.53%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 357.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHT

16.27%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 28.40%
Q3: 13.05%
Median: 6.85%
Q1: -0.81%
Min: -18.76%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.27% places CHT in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYV

4.28%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 4.28% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHT

20.60%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 37.46%
Q3: 22.24%
Median: 15.73%
Q1: 9.79%
Min: 2.06%

CHT’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.60% is around the midpoint for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LYV

4.30%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.30% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CHT	LYV
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.91%	357.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.11%	4.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.27%	4.28%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	20.60%	4.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.60%	25.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHT

1.63

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 1.63
Q3: 1.14
Median: 0.92
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.16

CHT’s Current Ratio of 1.63 is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LYV

0.96

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.96 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHT

0.11

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 3.82
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.32
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.11

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, CHT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LYV

60.46

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 60.46, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHT

166.33

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 14.66
Q3: 8.25
Median: 3.53
Q1: 1.47
Min: -2.60

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 166.33, CHT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CHT	LYV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.63	0.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.38	0.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.11	60.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	166.33	4.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHT vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHT vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHT

3.52%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 10.34%
Q3: 5.44%
Median: 3.89%
Q1: 1.73%
Min: 0.00%

CHT’s Dividend Yield of 3.52% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHT

409.88%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 270.06%
Q3: 135.21%
Median: 76.62%
Q1: 35.06%
Min: 0.00%

At 409.88%, CHT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CHT	LYV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.52%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	409.88%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHT

27.58

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 33.39
Q3: 23.91
Median: 16.72
Q1: 13.00
Min: 4.13

A P/E Ratio of 27.58 places CHT in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LYV

37.80

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 37.80 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHT

4.49

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.60
Median: 1.62
Q1: 0.94
Min: 0.35

CHT’s P/S Ratio of 4.49 is in the upper echelon for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LYV

1.62

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.62 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHT

2.53

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max: 5.77
Q3: 3.45
Median: 2.10
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.32

CHT’s P/B Ratio of 2.53 is within the conventional range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYV

287.54

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

At 287.54, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHT vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CHT	LYV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	27.58	37.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	4.49	1.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.53	287.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.50	16.45