CHRW vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CHRW	TT
Company Name	C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.	Trane Technologies plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Building Products
Market Capitalization	15.67 billion USD	94.66 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	October 16, 1997	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CHRW	TT
5-Day Price Return	-0.68%	4.42%
13-Week Price Return	37.99%	-3.53%
26-Week Price Return	29.96%	19.85%
52-Week Price Return	22.21%	9.90%
Month-to-Date Return	2.87%	1.53%
Year-to-Date Return	28.15%	14.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.14M	1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.40M	1.27M
3-Month Volatility	40.22%	25.48%
Beta	0.88	1.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

31.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 35.27%
Q3: 18.63%
Median: 11.99%
Q1: 7.41%
Min: 2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, CHRW’s Return on Equity of 31.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 46.90%
Q3: 27.60%
Median: 15.43%
Q1: 8.94%
Min: 0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.14%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 7.92%
Q3: 5.98%
Median: 4.11%
Q1: 2.45%
Min: 0.50%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max: 19.42%
Q3: 13.74%
Median: 8.72%
Q1: 4.81%
Min: 0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.45%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 11.33%
Q3: 8.19%
Median: 5.82%
Q1: 3.63%
Min: 1.06%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.45% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.72%
Q3: 17.70%
Median: 12.14%
Q1: 9.54%
Min: 1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CHRW	TT
Return on Equity (TTM)	31.06%	37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.96%	13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.14%	13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.45%	18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	16.38%	36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.31

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 1.73
Q3: 1.33
Median: 1.15
Q1: 0.95
Min: 0.61

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max: 3.10
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.30
Min: 0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.77

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 1.57
Q3: 1.25
Median: 0.77
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 49.07
Q3: 23.59
Median: 8.92
Q1: 6.34
Min: -0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 23.97
Q1: 7.29
Min: 2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CHRW	TT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.31	1.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.26	0.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	0.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.44	15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

1.91%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.20%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 0.55%
Min: 0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.51%
Q3: 1.92%
Median: 1.30%
Q1: 0.78%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

56.12%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 160.95%
Q3: 92.80%
Median: 60.17%
Q1: 4.60%
Min: 0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.12% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 76.90%
Median: 30.70%
Q1: 17.97%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CHRW	TT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.91%	0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	56.12%	27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

29.40

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 30.08
Q3: 23.03
Median: 18.40
Q1: 12.84
Min: 5.90

A P/E Ratio of 29.40 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TT

33.14

Building Products Industry

Max: 45.60
Q3: 30.36
Median: 21.97
Q1: 17.37
Min: 12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.14 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

0.92

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 2.28
Q3: 1.40
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 3.09
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

6.38

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max: 5.68
Q3: 3.23
Median: 1.97
Q1: 1.31
Min: 0.80

At 6.38, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 5.69
Median: 2.98
Q1: 1.80
Min: 0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHRW vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CHRW	TT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.40	33.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.92	4.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	6.38	12.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.49	33.67