Seek Returns logo

CHRW vs. RKLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and RKLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHRWRKLB
Company NameC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Rocket Lab Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization18.13 billion USD23.22 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqCM
Listing DateOctober 16, 1997November 24, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and RKLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. RKLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHRWRKLB
5-Day Price Return0.71%-12.25%
13-Week Price Return26.03%2.87%
26-Week Price Return58.70%108.61%
52-Week Price Return36.82%141.85%
Month-to-Date Return-0.77%-27.69%
Year-to-Date Return47.89%78.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.58M21.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.63M22.41M
3-Month Volatility43.73%80.67%
Beta0.932.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

33.82%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
18.50%
Q3
17.86%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.72%
Min
3.03%

CHRW’s Return on Equity of 33.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RKLB

-28.40%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

RKLB has a negative Return on Equity of -28.40%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.64%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.55%
Q3
5.92%
Median
4.17%
Q1
2.52%
Min
0.69%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-35.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

RKLB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.83%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.95%
Median
5.96%
Q1
3.78%
Min
1.22%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.83% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RKLB

-41.36%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

RKLB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -41.36%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHRWRKLB
Return on Equity (TTM)33.82%-28.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.39%-12.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.64%-35.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.83%-41.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.70%31.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.79
Q3
1.36
Median
1.15
Q1
0.93
Min
0.71

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.59 is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RKLB

3.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

RKLB’s Current Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.65

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.22
Median
0.76
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RKLB

0.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, RKLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RKLB

-45.87

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

RKLB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -45.87. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHRWRKLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.593.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.522.69
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.650.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.44-45.87

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. RKLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

1.66%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.05%
Q3
3.28%
Median
2.07%
Q1
0.51%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 1.66% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

RKLB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

50.26%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
98.33%
Median
59.97%
Q1
12.62%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.26% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKLB

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

RKLB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHRWRKLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.66%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.26%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

30.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.35
Q3
24.81
Median
17.35
Q1
14.31
Min
9.29

A P/E Ratio of 30.32 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKLB

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

P/E Ratio data for RKLB is currently unavailable.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

1.10

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.26
Q3
1.51
Median
0.65
Q1
0.42
Min
0.19

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RKLB

41.72

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 41.72, RKLB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

8.42

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
4.47
Q3
3.13
Median
2.01
Q1
1.52
Min
0.74

At 8.42, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKLB

18.10

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

RKLB’s P/B Ratio of 18.10 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CHRW vs. RKLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHRWRKLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.32--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.1041.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.4218.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.23--