Seek Returns logo

CHRW vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHRWMTZ
Company NameC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization14.29 billion USD14.33 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 16, 1997February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMTZ
5-Day Price Return2.69%-0.76%
13-Week Price Return26.10%18.89%
26-Week Price Return25.20%25.19%
52-Week Price Return22.58%70.19%
Month-to-Date Return4.92%-4.03%
Year-to-Date Return17.10%33.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.90M1.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.33M0.94M
3-Month Volatility43.58%29.01%
Beta0.911.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

31.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, CHRW’s Return on Equity of 31.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.14%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.45%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.45% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)31.06%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.96%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.14%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.45%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.31

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.77

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.311.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.442.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

2.11%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 2.11% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

56.12%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.12% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.11%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.12%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

26.54

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 26.54 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MTZ

55.30

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 55.30, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

0.83

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTZ

1.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

6.38

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 6.38, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CHRW vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.5455.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.831.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.384.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.1115.94