Seek Returns logo

CHRW vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHRWMMM
Company NameC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization14.30 billion USD82.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 16, 1997January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMMM
5-Day Price Return-0.36%-1.21%
13-Week Price Return20.98%0.40%
26-Week Price Return22.77%4.05%
52-Week Price Return19.82%21.77%
Month-to-Date Return4.99%3.71%
Year-to-Date Return17.19%19.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.29M3.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.29M3.45M
3-Month Volatility41.26%23.14%
Beta0.911.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

31.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, CHRW’s Return on Equity of 31.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.14%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.45%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.45% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)31.06%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.96%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.14%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.45%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.31

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.77

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.311.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.773.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.44-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

2.07%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

56.12%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.12% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.12%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

27.08

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 27.08 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

0.85

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

6.38

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 6.38, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHRW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHRWMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.0820.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.853.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.3818.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5630.86