Seek Returns logo

CHRW vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHRWLMT
Company NameC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Lockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization14.30 billion USD104.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 16, 1997January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHRWLMT
5-Day Price Return-0.36%1.98%
13-Week Price Return20.98%-5.72%
26-Week Price Return22.77%2.59%
52-Week Price Return19.82%-20.13%
Month-to-Date Return4.99%5.94%
Year-to-Date Return17.19%-8.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.29M1.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.29M1.66M
3-Month Volatility41.26%30.65%
Beta0.910.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

31.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, CHRW’s Return on Equity of 31.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.14%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.45%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.45% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHRWLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)31.06%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.96%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.14%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.45%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.31

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.77

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHRWLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.310.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.260.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.774.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.447.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

2.07%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

2.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

56.12%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.12% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHRWLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.12%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

27.08

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 27.08 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LMT

24.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.64 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

0.85

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT

1.44

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

6.38

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 6.38, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHRW vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHRWLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.0824.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.851.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.3820.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5620.78