Seek Returns logo

CHRW vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHRW and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHRWCTAS
Company NameC.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Cintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAir Freight & LogisticsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization14.30 billion USD87.34 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 16, 1997August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHRW and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHRW vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHRWCTAS
5-Day Price Return-0.36%-2.09%
13-Week Price Return20.98%-2.82%
26-Week Price Return22.77%5.21%
52-Week Price Return19.82%12.15%
Month-to-Date Return4.99%-2.62%
Year-to-Date Return17.19%18.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.29M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.29M1.47M
3-Month Volatility41.26%17.47%
Beta0.911.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHRW

31.06%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, CHRW’s Return on Equity of 31.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

3.14%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

CHRW’s Net Profit Margin of 3.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.53% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHRW

4.45%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

CHRW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.45% is around the midpoint for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHRWCTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)31.06%41.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.96%19.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.14%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.45%22.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%50.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

1.31

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

CHRW’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

0.77

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CHRW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

7.44

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

CHRW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHRWCTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.312.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.261.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.4424.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHRW vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHRW vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHRW

2.07%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Air Freight & Logistics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS

0.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

56.12%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

CHRW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.12% is within the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHRWCTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.12%33.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

27.08

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 27.08 places CHRW in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CTAS

48.29

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

A P/E Ratio of 48.29 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHRW

0.85

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

CHRW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CTAS

8.46

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.46, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHRW

6.38

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 6.38, CHRW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHRW vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Air Freight & Logistics and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHRWCTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.0848.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.858.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.3819.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5649.80