Seek Returns logo

CHKP vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHKP and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHKPUBER
Company NameCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryIsraelUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareGround Transportation
Market Capitalization21.23 billion USD191.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 1996May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHKP and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHKP vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHKPUBER
5-Day Price Return-2.27%-2.64%
13-Week Price Return4.55%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return-9.34%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return11.46%28.75%
Month-to-Date Return0.94%-5.06%
Year-to-Date Return5.80%51.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.73M20.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.89M17.13M
3-Month Volatility22.03%30.03%
Beta0.581.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHKP

35.27%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

37.62%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 37.62% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.54% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

31.76%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.76% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHKPUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)35.27%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.80%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)37.62%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.76%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.81%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

1.19

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CHKP’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CHKP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

1.00

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

CHKP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHKPUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.191.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.111.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.00-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHKP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHKP vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHKPUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

21.03

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s P/E Ratio of 21.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER

11.39

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.39 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

7.91

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

CHKP’s P/S Ratio of 7.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

3.82

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

7.28

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

CHKP’s P/B Ratio of 7.28 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHKP vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHKPUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0311.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.913.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.287.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9621.89