CHKP vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CHKP and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CHKP is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
Company Name	Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.	NetEase, Inc.
Country	Israel	China
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Software	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	20.20 billion USD	86.89 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	June 28, 1996	June 30, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHKP and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHKP vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
5-Day Price Return	1.67%	3.04%
13-Week Price Return	-13.40%	26.29%
26-Week Price Return	-11.45%	30.71%
52-Week Price Return	3.88%	50.64%
Month-to-Date Return	1.03%	3.53%
Year-to-Date Return	0.76%	51.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.32M	0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.92M	1.16M
3-Month Volatility	37.22%	37.46%
Beta	0.59	0.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHKP

30.64%

Software Industry

Max: 59.01%
Q3: 21.98%
Median: 7.15%
Q1: -11.12%
Min: -51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s Return on Equity of 30.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NTES

23.73%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 23.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

32.48%

Software Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 18.23%
Median: 5.60%
Q1: -9.22%
Min: -49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.48% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTES

30.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.17% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

33.00%

Software Industry

Max: 57.34%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 7.84%
Q1: -8.72%
Min: -51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTES

30.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.21% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
Return on Equity (TTM)	30.64%	23.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)	15.25%	16.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	32.48%	30.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	33.00%	30.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	86.92%	62.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

1.19

Software Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.24

CHKP’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES

3.21

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.21 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

0.00

Software Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

CHKP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTES

0.07

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.07 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

1.00

Software Industry

Max: 67.02
Q3: 19.86
Median: 0.70
Q1: -12.50
Min: -53.00

CHKP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.19	3.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.13	3.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.00	161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHKP vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHKP vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.08%
Q3: 0.03%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CHKP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES

2.02%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.02%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 1.32%
Q3: 0.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CHKP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES

36.47%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.47% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	36.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

23.58

Software Industry

Max: 149.35
Q3: 100.21
Median: 47.97
Q1: 26.77
Min: 11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s P/E Ratio of 23.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NTES

18.03

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 18.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

7.66

Software Industry

Max: 25.24
Q3: 13.52
Median: 8.15
Q1: 4.87
Min: 0.98

CHKP’s P/S Ratio of 7.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTES

5.44

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

8.46

Software Industry

Max: 30.95
Q3: 14.91
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.60
Min: 0.38

CHKP’s P/B Ratio of 8.46 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTES

3.25

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 3.25 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHKP vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CHKP	NTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	23.58	18.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.66	5.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.46	3.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	17.38	14.64