Seek Returns logo

CHKP vs. IONQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHKP and IONQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHKPIONQ
Company NameCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.IonQ, Inc.
CountryIsraelUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization20.20 billion USD12.23 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 1996January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHKP and IONQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHKP vs. IONQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHKPIONQ
5-Day Price Return1.67%1.78%
13-Week Price Return-13.40%25.30%
26-Week Price Return-11.45%-0.15%
52-Week Price Return3.88%513.24%
Month-to-Date Return1.03%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return0.76%-1.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.32M22.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.92M21.86M
3-Month Volatility37.22%98.83%
Beta0.592.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHKP

30.64%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s Return on Equity of 30.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IONQ

-67.52%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

IONQ has a negative Return on Equity of -67.52%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

32.48%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.48% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IONQ

-885.21%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

IONQ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -885.21%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

33.00%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IONQ

-700.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

IONQ has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -700.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHKPIONQ
Return on Equity (TTM)30.64%-67.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.25%-57.89%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.48%-885.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%-700.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.92%54.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

1.19

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CHKP’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IONQ

7.76

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

IONQ’s Current Ratio of 7.76 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CHKP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IONQ

0.00

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, IONQ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

1.00

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CHKP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IONQ

-23.93

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

IONQ has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.93. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHKPIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.197.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.137.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.00-23.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHKP vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHKP vs. IONQ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IONQ

0.00%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHKPIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

23.58

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s P/E Ratio of 23.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IONQ

--

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

P/E Ratio data for IONQ is currently unavailable.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

7.66

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CHKP’s P/S Ratio of 7.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IONQ

233.58

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 233.58, IONQ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

8.46

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CHKP’s P/B Ratio of 8.46 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IONQ

9.68

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

IONQ’s P/B Ratio of 9.68 is in the upper tier for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CHKP vs. IONQ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHKPIONQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.58--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.66233.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.469.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.38--