Seek Returns logo

CHKP vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHKP and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHKPGRMN
Company NameCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Garmin Ltd.
CountryIsraelSwitzerland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySoftwareHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization21.91 billion USD49.12 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 1996December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHKP and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHKP vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHKPGRMN
5-Day Price Return1.76%4.14%
13-Week Price Return-6.48%17.97%
26-Week Price Return-9.20%13.55%
52-Week Price Return7.19%41.51%
Month-to-Date Return7.13%1.82%
Year-to-Date Return10.82%19.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.84M0.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.84M0.86M
3-Month Volatility36.46%24.61%
Beta0.591.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHKP

30.64%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s Return on Equity of 30.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GRMN

19.82%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

32.48%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.48% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GRMN

23.21%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 23.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

33.00%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GRMN

26.02%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHKPGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)30.64%19.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.25%16.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.48%23.21%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%26.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.92%58.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

1.19

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CHKP’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GRMN

3.01

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CHKP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

1.00

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CHKP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHKPGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.193.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.131.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0073.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHKP vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHKP vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GRMN

1.24%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GRMN

38.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.63% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHKPGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

25.76

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s P/E Ratio of 25.76 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRMN

31.22

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

A P/E Ratio of 31.22 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

8.37

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CHKP’s P/S Ratio of 8.37 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRMN

7.25

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 7.25, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

8.46

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CHKP’s P/B Ratio of 8.46 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRMN

4.95

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 4.95, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHKP vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHKPGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.7631.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.377.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.464.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9943.46