Seek Returns logo

CHKP vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHKP and CLS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHKPCLS
Company NameCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Celestica Inc.
CountryIsraelCanada
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization20.20 billion USD23.49 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 1996June 30, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHKP and CLS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHKP vs. CLS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHKPCLS
5-Day Price Return1.67%7.73%
13-Week Price Return-13.40%126.89%
26-Week Price Return-11.45%43.11%
52-Week Price Return3.88%335.42%
Month-to-Date Return1.03%6.23%
Year-to-Date Return0.76%121.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.32M1.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.92M0.87M
3-Month Volatility37.22%54.67%
Beta0.592.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHKP

30.64%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s Return on Equity of 30.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLS

30.66%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 30.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

32.48%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.48% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS

5.09%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHKP

33.00%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places CHKP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLS

7.01%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHKPCLS
Return on Equity (TTM)30.64%30.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.25%8.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.48%5.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%7.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.92%11.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

1.19

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CHKP’s Current Ratio of 1.19 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLS

1.44

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CHKP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS

0.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

1.00

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CHKP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHKPCLS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.191.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.130.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.0036.72

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHKP vs. CLS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHKP vs. CLS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CHKP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHKPCLS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

23.58

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CHKP’s P/E Ratio of 23.58 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLS

45.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 45.70 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHKP

7.66

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CHKP’s P/S Ratio of 7.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLS

2.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHKP

8.46

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CHKP’s P/B Ratio of 8.46 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLS

10.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.12, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CHKP vs. CLS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHKPCLS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.5845.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.662.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.4610.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.3863.72