Seek Returns logo

CHD vs. GIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CHD and GIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCHDGIS
Company NameChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.General Mills, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization21.65 billion USD26.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CHD and GIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CHD vs. GIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHDGIS
5-Day Price Return1.44%-0.48%
13-Week Price Return-9.83%-3.20%
26-Week Price Return-18.80%-15.97%
52-Week Price Return-12.29%-31.30%
Month-to-Date Return1.44%-0.48%
Year-to-Date Return-15.11%-21.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.12M5.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.22M5.92M
3-Month Volatility19.43%19.11%
Beta0.46-0.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CHD

12.01%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CHD’s Return on Equity of 12.01% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

8.66%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry, CHD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.66% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CHD

11.91%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

CHD’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.91% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHDGIS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.01%31.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.95%8.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.66%15.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.91%21.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.47%34.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

1.84

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CHD’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

0.50

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

CHD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CHD

13.69

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CHD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHDGIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.840.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.330.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.501.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.696.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

CHD vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CHD vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CHD

1.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CHD’s Dividend Yield of 1.32% is below the typical range for the Household Products industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

GIS

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.96%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CHD

35.75%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CHD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is in the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHDGIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.32%4.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%45.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CHD

41.07

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

At 41.07, CHD’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Household Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GIS

9.20

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.20 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CHD

3.56

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CHD’s P/S Ratio of 3.56 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GIS

1.40

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CHD

5.39

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

CHD’s P/B Ratio of 5.39 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CHD vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHDGIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.079.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.561.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.392.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.1812.81