Seek Returns logo

CFLT vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CFLT and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCFLTRBLX
Company NameConfluent, Inc.Roblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySoftwareEntertainment
Market Capitalization5.96 billion USD87.89 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 24, 2021March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFLT and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFLT vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCFLTRBLX
5-Day Price Return2.13%-2.20%
13-Week Price Return-22.61%72.51%
26-Week Price Return-42.15%88.89%
52-Week Price Return-14.32%239.71%
Month-to-Date Return-2.45%-7.99%
Year-to-Date Return-38.16%119.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.25M10.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.05M8.54M
3-Month Volatility75.14%45.99%
Beta0.951.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFLT

-31.29%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -31.29%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-29.27%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -29.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-37.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -37.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCFLTRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)-31.29%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)-11.52%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-29.27%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-37.29%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.22%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

3.98

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 3.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

1.03

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CFLT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

-87.07

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CFLT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -87.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCFLTRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.980.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.830.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.032.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-87.07-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFLT vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFLT vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCFLTRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

5.60

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RBLX

21.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

With a P/S Ratio of 21.85, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

7.98

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CFLT’s P/B Ratio of 7.98 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CFLT vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCFLTRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.6021.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.98202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)120.4393.32