Seek Returns logo

CFLT vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CFLT and QCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCFLTQCOM
Company NameConfluent, Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization8.02 billion USD182.86 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 24, 2021December 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFLT and QCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFLT vs. QCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCFLTQCOM
5-Day Price Return-0.98%1.40%
13-Week Price Return30.97%10.22%
26-Week Price Return0.78%14.96%
52-Week Price Return-19.66%8.45%
Month-to-Date Return-0.30%-3.83%
Year-to-Date Return-16.67%13.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.48M11.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.61M9.15M
3-Month Volatility45.96%36.87%
Beta0.971.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFLT

-29.17%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -29.17%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

QCOM

21.51%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

QCOM’s Return on Equity of 21.51% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-27.32%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -27.32%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

QCOM

12.51%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

QCOM’s Net Profit Margin of 12.51% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-34.74%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -34.74%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

QCOM

27.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

QCOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 27.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCFLTQCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)-29.17%21.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)-10.97%10.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-27.32%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-34.74%27.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.14%55.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

4.01

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 4.01 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

QCOM

2.82

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

QCOM’s Current Ratio of 2.82 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

0.98

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CFLT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.98. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

QCOM

0.70

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

QCOM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

-87.07

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

CFLT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -87.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QCOM

38.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

QCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCFLTQCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.012.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.852.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.980.70
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-87.0738.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFLT vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFLT vs. QCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QCOM

2.07%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.07%, QCOM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QCOM

32.79%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QCOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.79% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCFLTQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

--

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

P/E Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

QCOM

33.10

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

QCOM’s P/E Ratio of 33.10 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

7.12

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 7.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QCOM

4.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

QCOM’s P/S Ratio of 4.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

6.10

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

CFLT’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QCOM

8.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

QCOM’s P/B Ratio of 8.40 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CFLT vs. QCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCFLTQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.124.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.108.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)122.5014.31