Seek Returns logo

CFLT vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CFLT and MRVL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCFLTMRVL
Company NameConfluent, Inc.Marvell Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization6.13 billion USD62.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 24, 2021June 30, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFLT and MRVL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFLT vs. MRVL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCFLTMRVL
5-Day Price Return-0.45%-4.87%
13-Week Price Return-15.49%21.44%
26-Week Price Return-49.08%-31.96%
52-Week Price Return-19.50%2.33%
Month-to-Date Return0.37%-9.17%
Year-to-Date Return-36.37%-33.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.08M13.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.15M18.94M
3-Month Volatility73.21%48.40%
Beta0.951.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFLT

-31.29%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -31.29%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-29.27%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -29.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-37.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -37.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MRVL

-4.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MRVL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCFLTMRVL
Return on Equity (TTM)-31.29%-3.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)-11.52%-2.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-29.27%-7.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-37.29%-4.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.22%43.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

3.98

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 3.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

1.03

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CFLT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MRVL

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

-87.07

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CFLT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -87.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCFLTMRVL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.981.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.830.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.030.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-87.07-4.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFLT vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFLT vs. MRVL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MRVL

0.34%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL

27.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.43% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCFLTMRVL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%27.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

5.54

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MRVL

9.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 9.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

7.98

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CFLT’s P/B Ratio of 7.98 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MRVL

4.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CFLT vs. MRVL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCFLTMRVL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.549.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.984.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)119.2544.82