CFLT vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 11, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CFLT and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
Company Name	Confluent, Inc.	Fortive Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Industrials
GICS Industry	Software	Machinery
Market Capitalization	7.69 billion USD	16.86 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 24, 2021	July 5, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFLT and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFLT vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
5-Day Price Return	8.67%	0.12%
13-Week Price Return	-12.75%	-5.94%
26-Week Price Return	5.19%	-26.29%
52-Week Price Return	11.67%	-34.70%
Month-to-Date Return	12.63%	1.74%
Year-to-Date Return	-20.24%	-33.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume	9.22M	2.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume	7.73M	3.87M
3-Month Volatility	77.62%	22.43%
Beta	0.96	1.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFLT

-31.29%

Software Industry

Max: 66.28%
Q3: 21.28%
Median: 9.33%
Q1: -8.77%
Min: -48.16%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -31.29%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max: 33.68%
Q3: 20.05%
Median: 12.37%
Q1: 8.67%
Min: -7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-29.27%

Software Industry

Max: 51.92%
Q3: 19.23%
Median: 6.98%
Q1: -7.14%
Min: -41.00%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -29.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.72%
Q3: 11.07%
Median: 7.62%
Q1: 5.05%
Min: -1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-37.29%

Software Industry

Max: 60.40%
Q3: 21.25%
Median: 9.90%
Q1: -4.97%
Min: -43.50%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -37.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 15.99%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
Return on Equity (TTM)	-31.29%	7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-11.52%	4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-29.27%	12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-37.29%	17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	74.22%	59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

3.98

Software Industry

Max: 4.29
Q3: 2.37
Median: 1.40
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 3.98 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.13
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.34
Min: 0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

1.03

Software Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

CFLT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.56
Q3: 0.79
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

-87.07

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 32.64
Median: 1.00
Q1: -9.84
Min: -71.23

CFLT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -87.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max: 81.58
Q3: 37.68
Median: 13.76
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.98	0.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	3.83	0.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.03	0.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-87.07	6.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFLT vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFLT vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.22%
Q3: 0.11%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FTV

0.65%

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.55%
Q3: 2.66%
Median: 1.90%
Q1: 1.23%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 3.29%
Q3: 2.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 198.34%
Q3: 101.42%
Median: 62.79%
Q1: 29.85%
Min: 0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

Software Industry

Max: 145.74
Q3: 94.88
Median: 45.35
Q1: 26.66
Min: 8.80

P/E Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

FTV

21.99

Machinery Industry

Max: 47.95
Q3: 30.11
Median: 22.35
Q1: 16.56
Min: 6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.99 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

7.22

Software Industry

Max: 25.67
Q3: 13.68
Median: 8.28
Q1: 4.95
Min: 0.90

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 7.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV

2.75

Machinery Industry

Max: 4.97
Q3: 2.76
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

7.98

Software Industry

Max: 30.67
Q3: 14.92
Median: 8.52
Q1: 3.89
Min: 0.38

CFLT’s P/B Ratio of 7.98 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.29
Q3: 4.06
Median: 2.67
Q1: 1.54
Min: 0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CFLT vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CFLT	FTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	21.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.22	2.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.98	2.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	155.33	12.20