CFG vs. PUK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CFG and PUK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CFG is a standard domestic listing, while PUK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CFG	PUK
Company Name	Citizens Financial Group, Inc.	Prudential plc
Country	United States	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Insurance
Market Capitalization	20.94 billion USD	34.24 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 24, 2014	June 29, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFG and PUK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFG vs. PUK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CFG	PUK
5-Day Price Return	4.10%	1.44%
13-Week Price Return	16.73%	13.41%
26-Week Price Return	0.48%	48.30%
52-Week Price Return	22.91%	50.34%
Month-to-Date Return	1.74%	2.14%
Year-to-Date Return	10.95%	54.54%
10-Day Avg. Volume	4.24M	3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume	5.19M	4.44M
3-Month Volatility	26.16%	18.04%
Beta	1.17	1.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFG

6.41%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

CFG’s Return on Equity of 6.41% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

PUK

13.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

PUK’s Return on Equity of 13.58% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFG

24.56%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

CFG’s Net Profit Margin of 24.56% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PUK

19.26%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.26% places PUK in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFG

31.45%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

CFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.45% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PUK

20.87%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CFG	PUK
Return on Equity (TTM)	6.41%	13.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.73%	1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	24.56%	19.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	31.45%	20.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PUK

0.36

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFG

0.45

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

PUK

0.27

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

PUK

8.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CFG	PUK
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	8.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFG vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFG vs. PUK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFG

4.28%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

CFG’s Dividend Yield of 4.28% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PUK

1.63%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFG

55.84%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

CFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.84% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PUK

24.16%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

PUK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.16% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CFG	PUK
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.28%	1.63%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	55.84%	24.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFG

13.04

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 13.04 places CFG in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PUK

14.84

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

PUK’s P/E Ratio of 14.84 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFG

1.48

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

PUK

2.86

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

PUK’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFG

0.77

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

CFG’s P/B Ratio of 0.77 is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

PUK

1.31

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

PUK’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CFG vs. PUK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CFG	PUK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.04	14.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.48	2.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	1.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.00	9.67