Seek Returns logo

CF vs. RGLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CF and RGLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCFRGLD
Company NameCF Industries Holdings, Inc.Royal Gold, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization14.92 billion USD13.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateAugust 11, 2005June 9, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CF and RGLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CF vs. RGLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCFRGLD
5-Day Price Return-2.13%5.87%
13-Week Price Return-2.50%12.79%
26-Week Price Return17.04%25.88%
52-Week Price Return4.74%41.45%
Month-to-Date Return3.54%11.69%
Year-to-Date Return5.13%52.13%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.35M1.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.81M0.84M
3-Month Volatility31.47%27.23%
Beta0.900.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CF

26.14%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, CF’s Return on Equity of 26.14% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RGLD

14.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

RGLD’s Return on Equity of 14.19% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CF

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places CF in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RGLD

56.22%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

RGLD’s Net Profit Margin of 56.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CF

29.60%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

CF’s Operating Profit Margin of 29.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

RGLD

64.70%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 64.70% places RGLD in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCFRGLD
Return on Equity (TTM)26.14%14.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.58%13.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.20%56.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.60%64.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.60%86.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CF

3.22

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

CF’s Current Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RGLD

4.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

RGLD’s Current Ratio of 4.49 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CF

0.60

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

CF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RGLD

0.00

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, RGLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CF

26.60

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

CF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.60 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RGLD

112.92

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 112.92, RGLD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCFRGLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.224.49
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.784.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.600.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)26.60112.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CF vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CF vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CF

2.36%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

CF’s Dividend Yield of 2.36% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RGLD

0.85%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CF

26.34%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

CF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.34% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RGLD

24.89%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.89% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCFRGLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.36%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.34%24.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CF

11.16

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CF’s P/E Ratio of 11.16 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RGLD

29.44

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

RGLD’s P/E Ratio of 29.44 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CF

2.25

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

CF’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RGLD

16.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 16.55, RGLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Metals & Mining industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CF

3.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

CF’s P/B Ratio of 3.00 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RGLD

3.54

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

RGLD’s P/B Ratio of 3.54 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CF vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCFRGLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.1629.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.2516.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.003.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.1338.30