Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CELH is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCELHUL
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization14.46 billion USD153.09 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHUL
5-Day Price Return11.87%-0.55%
13-Week Price Return50.24%-1.69%
26-Week Price Return155.33%-3.77%
52-Week Price Return47.44%-5.41%
Month-to-Date Return23.67%1.86%
Year-to-Date Return112.87%-1.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.71M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.01M2.75M
3-Month Volatility49.84%13.54%
Beta1.410.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

8.97%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

8.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 8.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

9.37%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.37% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHUL
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.34%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.40%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.37%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.43%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

3.38

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.380.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.990.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.0022.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.19%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UL

3.47%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.47%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

15.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.73% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%3.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.73%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

129.01

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 129.01, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UL

22.94

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.94 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

10.84

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 10.84, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UL

2.13

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

6.61

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 6.61, CELH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CELH vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)129.0122.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.842.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.617.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.0119.80