Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. PM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and PM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHPM
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Philip Morris International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesTobacco
Market Capitalization14.82 billion USD256.67 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007March 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and PM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. PM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHPM
5-Day Price Return10.81%-1.91%
13-Week Price Return23.93%-9.39%
26-Week Price Return64.73%3.77%
52-Week Price Return76.73%32.50%
Month-to-Date Return-8.57%-0.83%
Year-to-Date Return118.26%33.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.14M6.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.49M5.67M
3-Month Volatility50.83%27.04%
Beta1.360.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PM

575.44%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
13.16%
Q1
5.02%
Min
4.04%

PM’s Return on Equity of 575.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PM

21.08%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
16.88%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.51%
Min
4.74%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places PM in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PM

36.28%

Tobacco Industry

Max
18.53%
Q3
15.03%
Median
11.76%
Q1
11.00%
Min
6.94%

PM’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHPM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%575.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.77%12.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%21.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%36.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.53%66.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PM

0.83

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.84
Median
1.26
Q1
0.79
Min
0.39

PM’s Current Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PM

186.08

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.58
Q1
0.07
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 186.08, PM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PM

11.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
306.04
Q3
126.21
Median
9.35
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

PM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.110.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.42186.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.0011.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.19%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PM

3.33%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.77%
Q3
6.12%
Median
5.06%
Q1
3.83%
Min
0.57%

PM’s Dividend Yield of 3.33% is in the lower quartile for the Tobacco industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PM

70.92%

Tobacco Industry

Max
78.29%
Q3
75.97%
Median
64.37%
Q1
50.14%
Min
49.96%

PM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.92% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%3.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.64%70.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

112.19

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 112.19, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PM

30.47

Tobacco Industry

Max
44.17
Q3
36.23
Median
27.79
Q1
11.97
Min
9.91

PM’s P/E Ratio of 30.47 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

8.87

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 8.87, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PM

6.42

Tobacco Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
5.15
Median
2.97
Q1
1.39
Min
0.80

PM’s P/S Ratio of 6.42 is in the upper echelon for the Tobacco industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PM

1,368.86

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
3.34
Q1
1.97
Min
1.05

At 1,368.86, PM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CELH vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)112.1930.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.876.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.721,368.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.1125.75