Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. MDLZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and MDLZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHMDLZ
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Mondelez International, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesFood Products
Market Capitalization14.46 billion USD80.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007June 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and MDLZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. MDLZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHMDLZ
5-Day Price Return11.87%-0.34%
13-Week Price Return50.24%-5.53%
26-Week Price Return155.33%7.54%
52-Week Price Return47.44%-10.23%
Month-to-Date Return23.67%-3.86%
Year-to-Date Return112.87%4.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.71M8.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.01M7.87M
3-Month Volatility49.84%22.56%
Beta1.410.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

8.97%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MDLZ

13.64%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.64% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

8.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 8.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MDLZ

9.81%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

9.37%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.37% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MDLZ

12.44%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.44% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHMDLZ
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%13.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.34%5.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.40%9.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.37%12.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.43%32.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

3.38

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MDLZ

0.64

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MDLZ

0.80

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MDLZ

13.32

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHMDLZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.380.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.990.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.0013.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.19%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MDLZ

3.06%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.06% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

15.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.73% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MDLZ

66.77%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.77% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHMDLZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%3.06%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.73%66.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

129.01

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 129.01, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MDLZ

21.82

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 21.82 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

10.84

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 10.84, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MDLZ

2.14

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.14 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

6.61

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 6.61, CELH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDLZ

3.33

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CELH vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHMDLZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)129.0121.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.842.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.613.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.0127.77