Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. KDP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and KDP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHKDP
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization16.22 billion USD34.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007May 7, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and KDP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. KDP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHKDP
5-Day Price Return6.81%-0.62%
13-Week Price Return36.46%-23.98%
26-Week Price Return74.75%-28.21%
52-Week Price Return118.29%-29.24%
Month-to-Date Return9.43%0.27%
Year-to-Date Return138.84%-20.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.26M16.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.30M14.71M
3-Month Volatility51.26%33.59%
Beta0.990.36

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHKDP
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%6.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.77%2.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%9.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%16.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.53%54.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHKDP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.110.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.420.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.003.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.17%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KDP

3.55%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHKDP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%3.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.64%54.58%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

122.36

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 122.36, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KDP

22.53

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

KDP’s P/E Ratio of 22.53 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

9.67

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 9.67, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KDP

2.20

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 2.20 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CELH vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHKDP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)122.3622.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.672.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.721.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.4621.97