Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. HIMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and HIMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHHIMS
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesHealth Care
GICS IndustryBeveragesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization14.46 billion USD10.92 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007September 13, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and HIMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. HIMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHHIMS
5-Day Price Return11.87%-5.33%
13-Week Price Return50.24%-12.46%
26-Week Price Return155.33%19.42%
52-Week Price Return47.44%202.63%
Month-to-Date Return23.67%-26.97%
Year-to-Date Return112.87%99.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.71M38.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.01M42.15M
3-Month Volatility49.84%110.00%
Beta1.412.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

8.97%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HIMS

38.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

HIMS’s Return on Equity of 38.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

8.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 8.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HIMS

9.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.62% places HIMS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

9.37%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.37% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

HIMS

6.24%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

HIMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.24% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHHIMS
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%38.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.34%18.98%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.40%9.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.37%6.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.43%76.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

3.38

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HIMS

4.98

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

HIMS’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HIMS

1.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

HIMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HIMS

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

Interest Coverage Ratio data for HIMS is currently unavailable.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHHIMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.384.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.994.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.00--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. HIMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.19%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

15.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.73% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HIMS

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HIMS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHHIMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.73%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

129.01

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 129.01, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HIMS

56.42

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

At 56.42, HIMS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

10.84

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 10.84, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HIMS

5.43

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 5.43, HIMS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

6.61

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 6.61, CELH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HIMS

19.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 19.83, HIMS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CELH vs. HIMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHHIMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)129.0156.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.845.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.6119.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.0146.19