Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. GIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and GIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHGIS
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.General Mills, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesFood Products
Market Capitalization15.13 billion USD26.86 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and GIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. GIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHGIS
5-Day Price Return3.16%1.41%
13-Week Price Return26.07%-5.25%
26-Week Price Return64.80%-15.77%
52-Week Price Return92.78%-31.30%
Month-to-Date Return2.10%-0.12%
Year-to-Date Return122.86%-21.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.09M5.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.43M5.89M
3-Month Volatility50.93%19.24%
Beta0.99-0.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHGIS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%31.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.77%8.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%15.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%21.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.53%34.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHGIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.110.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.421.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.006.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.18%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GIS

4.95%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.95%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHGIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.18%4.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.64%45.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

114.66

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 114.66, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GIS

9.21

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.21 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

9.07

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 9.07, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GIS

1.40

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CELH vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHGIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)114.669.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.071.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.722.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)71.6512.83