Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. FIZZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and FIZZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHFIZZ
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.National Beverage Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization14.46 billion USD4.37 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007September 13, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and FIZZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. FIZZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHFIZZ
5-Day Price Return11.87%0.50%
13-Week Price Return50.24%6.12%
26-Week Price Return155.33%16.02%
52-Week Price Return47.44%2.73%
Month-to-Date Return23.67%1.77%
Year-to-Date Return112.87%9.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.71M0.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.01M0.18M
3-Month Volatility49.84%25.05%
Beta1.410.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

8.97%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIZZ

49.46%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

In the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, FIZZ’s Return on Equity of 49.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

8.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 8.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIZZ

15.55%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.55% places FIZZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

9.37%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.37% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FIZZ

19.60%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.60% places FIZZ in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHFIZZ
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%49.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.34%31.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.40%15.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.37%19.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.43%36.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

3.38

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIZZ

2.90

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

FIZZ’s Current Ratio of 2.90 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FIZZ

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, FIZZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FIZZ

1,039.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 1,039.00, FIZZ demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHFIZZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.382.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.992.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.001,039.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. FIZZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. FIZZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.19%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FIZZ

7.03%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

FIZZ’s Dividend Yield of 7.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

15.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.73% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FIZZ

535.66%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

At 535.66%, FIZZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Beverages industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHFIZZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%7.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.73%535.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

129.01

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 129.01, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIZZ

23.15

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

FIZZ’s P/E Ratio of 23.15 is within the middle range for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

10.84

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 10.84, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

FIZZ

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

FIZZ’s P/S Ratio of 3.60 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

6.61

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 6.61, CELH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIZZ

9.24

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 9.24, FIZZ’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CELH vs. FIZZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHFIZZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)129.0123.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.843.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.619.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)70.0125.38