Seek Returns logo

CDW vs. SAIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDW and SAIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCDWSAIC
Company NameCDW CorporationScience Applications International Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization21.88 billion USD5.52 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 27, 2013September 16, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDW and SAIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDW vs. SAIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDWSAIC
5-Day Price Return0.49%0.41%
13-Week Price Return-11.24%-3.98%
26-Week Price Return-11.02%17.53%
52-Week Price Return-23.85%-6.76%
Month-to-Date Return-4.28%5.66%
Year-to-Date Return-4.10%5.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.23M0.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.18M0.52M
3-Month Volatility25.24%35.66%
Beta1.030.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDW

45.37%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 45.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SAIC

22.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

SAIC’s Return on Equity of 22.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

4.92%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SAIC

4.70%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

SAIC’s Net Profit Margin of 4.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

7.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.64% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SAIC

7.36%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

SAIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.36% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDWSAIC
Return on Equity (TTM)45.37%22.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.26%6.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.92%4.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.64%7.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.57%11.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

1.35

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.35 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAIC

0.78

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

SAIC’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

2.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SAIC

1.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

SAIC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Professional Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SAIC

4.40

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, SAIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.40 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDWSAIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.350.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.170.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.281.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.694.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDW vs. SAIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDW vs. SAIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDW

1.51%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.51% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAIC

1.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

SAIC’s Dividend Yield of 1.35% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDW

30.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.73% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAIC

20.96%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

SAIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.96% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDWSAIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.51%1.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.73%20.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDW

20.40

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

CDW’s P/E Ratio of 20.40 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAIC

15.52

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, SAIC’s P/E Ratio of 15.52 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDW

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SAIC

0.73

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, SAIC’s P/S Ratio of 0.73 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

9.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 9.53, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SAIC

3.70

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

SAIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.70 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CDW vs. SAIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDWSAIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.4015.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.000.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.533.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.5611.96