Seek Returns logo

CDW vs. GRMN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDW and GRMN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCDWGRMN
Company NameCDW CorporationGarmin Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesSwitzerland
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization18.62 billion USD36.72 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 27, 2013December 8, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDW and GRMN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDW vs. GRMN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDWGRMN
5-Day Price Return1.24%-4.24%
13-Week Price Return-11.41%-16.45%
26-Week Price Return-23.91%-3.15%
52-Week Price Return-22.00%-8.85%
Month-to-Date Return-8.97%-9.26%
Year-to-Date Return-16.64%-5.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.07M1.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M0.88M
3-Month Volatility32.22%30.78%
Beta1.081.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDW

43.43%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 43.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GRMN

19.26%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.22%
Median
11.18%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-7.31%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Return on Equity of 19.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

4.76%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRMN

22.63%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.03%
Q3
9.13%
Median
6.61%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-4.24%

GRMN’s Net Profit Margin of 22.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

7.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.39% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRMN

25.61%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.79%
Q3
12.10%
Median
9.44%
Q1
5.22%
Min
-3.50%

GRMN’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDWGRMN
Return on Equity (TTM)43.43%19.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.99%15.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.76%22.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.39%25.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.60%58.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRMN

3.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.43
Q3
3.68
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.75

GRMN’s Current Ratio of 3.32 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

2.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.22, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GRMN

0.00

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.77
Q3
0.83
Median
0.34
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry, GRMN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GRMN

73.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

GRMN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.26 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDWGRMN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.393.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.242.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.220.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6973.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDW vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDW vs. GRMN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDW

1.75%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRMN

1.73%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.27%
Q3
3.94%
Median
1.84%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDW

31.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.39% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRMN

40.42%

Household Durables Industry

Max
154.55%
Q3
65.87%
Median
40.54%
Q1
6.74%
Min
0.00%

GRMN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.42% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDWGRMN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.75%1.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.39%40.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDW

17.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/E Ratio of 17.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GRMN

23.38

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.05
Q3
20.97
Median
12.60
Q1
9.92
Min
6.71

A P/E Ratio of 23.38 places GRMN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDW

0.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GRMN

5.29

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.31
Median
0.86
Q1
0.56
Min
0.15

With a P/S Ratio of 5.29, GRMN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

8.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 8.22, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GRMN

5.57

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.77
Q3
2.08
Median
1.44
Q1
1.07
Min
0.58

At 5.57, GRMN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CDW vs. GRMN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDWGRMN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.9723.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.855.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.225.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7227.56