Seek Returns logo

CDW vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDW and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CDW is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCDWGDS
Company NameCDW CorporationGDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsIT Services
Market Capitalization18.62 billion USD5.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGM
Listing DateJune 27, 2013November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDW and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDW vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDWGDS
5-Day Price Return1.24%-9.57%
13-Week Price Return-11.41%-9.85%
26-Week Price Return-23.91%7.99%
52-Week Price Return-22.00%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return-8.97%-13.70%
Year-to-Date Return-16.64%29.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.07M5.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M10.11M
3-Month Volatility32.22%59.37%
Beta1.082.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDW

43.43%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 43.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

4.76%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

7.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.39% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDWGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)43.43%19.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.99%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.76%42.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.39%22.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.60%21.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

2.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.22, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDWGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.392.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.241.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.221.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.690.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDW vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDW vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDW

1.75%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDW

31.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.39% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDWGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.75%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDW

17.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/E Ratio of 17.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GDS

9.32

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDW

0.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GDS

3.99

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 3.99 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

8.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 8.22, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CDW vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDWGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.979.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.853.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.221.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.72--