CDNS vs. MSTR: Cadence Design Systems vs. Strategy Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Strategy (MSTR) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Strategy (MSTR) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.60, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is closer to market-like at 1.09 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Strategy (MSTR) reports a negative ROE of -21.59%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 22.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 22.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Strategy (MSTR) at 0.00%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Strategy (MSTR) reports a negative operating margin of -2.07%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 28.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.12% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Strategy (MSTR) at 2.97% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports EPS growth of 5.45%, ranked against its industry; Strategy (MSTR) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 1.36 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Strategy (MSTR) at 4.04 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 0.41 and Strategy (MSTR) at 0.10 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Strategy (MSTR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Strategy (MSTR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at 63.60 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Strategy (MSTR) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both look expensive on sales: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.31 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Strategy (MSTR) at 110.23 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Strategy (MSTR) at 0.98 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 12.77 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics