CDNS vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CDNS and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
Company Name	Cadence Design Systems, Inc.	Jabil Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Software	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization	85.39 billion USD	21.46 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 10, 1987	May 3, 1993
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDNS and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDNS vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
5-Day Price Return	-4.26%	-7.93%
13-Week Price Return	-9.99%	-6.25%
26-Week Price Return	-1.17%	20.87%
52-Week Price Return	2.76%	53.25%
Month-to-Date Return	-7.02%	-8.61%
Year-to-Date Return	4.82%	40.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.02M	1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.80M	1.35M
3-Month Volatility	32.02%	39.96%
Beta	1.03	1.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDNS

21.59%

Software Industry

Max: 65.88%
Q3: 22.54%
Median: 10.46%
Q1: -6.54%
Min: -41.05%

CDNS’s Return on Equity of 21.59% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 25.62%
Q3: 13.32%
Median: 9.23%
Q1: 4.70%
Min: -3.60%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

20.35%

Software Industry

Max: 53.50%
Q3: 20.30%
Median: 9.60%
Q1: -4.98%
Min: -41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.35% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 18.22%
Q3: 10.34%
Median: 7.81%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -4.57%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

28.50%

Software Industry

Max: 61.99%
Q3: 23.67%
Median: 10.93%
Q1: -3.57%
Min: -40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.50% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 26.64%
Q3: 15.10%
Median: 9.55%
Q1: 4.57%
Min: -7.07%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
Return on Equity (TTM)	21.59%	45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.44%	3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	20.35%	2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	28.50%	3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	85.54%	8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

3.05

Software Industry

Max: 4.01
Q3: 2.27
Median: 1.50
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

CDNS’s Current Ratio of 3.05 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 5.52
Q3: 3.20
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.51
Min: 0.33

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

0.48

Software Industry

Max: 2.04
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

CDNS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 1.12
Q3: 0.55
Median: 0.33
Q1: 0.10
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

39.06

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 33.82
Median: 1.59
Q1: -10.48
Min: -71.23

CDNS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.06 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JBL

5.62

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 114.40
Q3: 51.32
Median: 14.03
Q1: 3.74
Min: -61.15

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.05	1.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.49	0.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	1.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	39.06	5.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDNS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDNS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 0.34%
Q3: 0.17%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CDNS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.17%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 5.16%
Q3: 2.39%
Median: 1.18%
Q1: 0.12%
Min: 0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 12.76%
Q3: 6.56%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CDNS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 197.57%
Q3: 87.33%
Median: 36.23%
Q1: 3.99%
Min: 0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

80.80

Software Industry

Max: 142.78
Q3: 72.24
Median: 36.21
Q1: 24.24
Min: 4.55

A P/E Ratio of 80.80 places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JBL

32.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 71.05
Q3: 42.87
Median: 27.84
Q1: 19.17
Min: 7.73

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 32.70 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

16.45

Software Industry

Max: 20.79
Q3: 12.71
Median: 6.75
Q1: 4.56
Min: 0.87

CDNS’s P/S Ratio of 16.45 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL

0.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 7.81
Q3: 4.01
Median: 2.09
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.72 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

18.41

Software Industry

Max: 30.49
Q3: 14.84
Median: 8.09
Q1: 4.32
Min: 0.38

CDNS’s P/B Ratio of 18.41 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max: 7.49
Q3: 4.09
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.55
Min: 0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CDNS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CDNS	JBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	80.80	32.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	16.45	0.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	18.41	14.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	57.98	18.33