Seek Returns logo

CDNS vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDNS and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCDNSFIS
Company NameCadence Design Systems, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization85.39 billion USD33.77 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 10, 1987June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDNS and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDNS vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
5-Day Price Return-4.26%-1.83%
13-Week Price Return-9.99%-9.30%
26-Week Price Return-1.17%-17.30%
52-Week Price Return2.76%-27.72%
Month-to-Date Return-7.02%2.75%
Year-to-Date Return4.82%-20.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.02M4.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.80M3.90M
3-Month Volatility32.02%24.59%
Beta1.030.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDNS

21.59%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

CDNS’s Return on Equity of 21.59% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

1.03%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

20.35%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.35% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS

1.45%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.45% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

28.50%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.50% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS

13.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.74% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)21.59%1.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.44%0.46%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.35%1.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)28.50%13.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.54%36.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

3.05

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CDNS’s Current Ratio of 3.05 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIS

0.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

0.48

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CDNS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.94

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

39.06

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

CDNS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.06 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FIS

5.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.050.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.490.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.065.52

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDNS vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDNS vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

99.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 99.68% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%99.68%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

80.80

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

A P/E Ratio of 80.80 places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FIS

218.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 218.86, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

16.45

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

CDNS’s P/S Ratio of 16.45 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FIS

3.18

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

18.41

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

CDNS’s P/B Ratio of 18.41 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)80.80218.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)16.453.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.412.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)57.9817.62