Seek Returns logo

CDNS vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDNS and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCDNSFIS
Company NameCadence Design Systems, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization95.91 billion USD34.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 10, 1987June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDNS and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDNS vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
5-Day Price Return0.26%2.82%
13-Week Price Return13.74%-19.00%
26-Week Price Return34.06%-11.58%
52-Week Price Return29.86%-20.68%
Month-to-Date Return0.20%-5.54%
Year-to-Date Return17.14%-18.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.84M4.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.85M3.51M
3-Month Volatility35.79%27.11%
Beta1.051.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDNS

21.28%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CDNS’s Return on Equity of 21.28% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

19.88%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.88% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDNS

30.24%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.24% places CDNS in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)21.28%0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.04%0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.88%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.24%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.57%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

2.82

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CDNS’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

0.50

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CDNS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

39.06

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CDNS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.06 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.820.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.330.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.500.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)39.066.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDNS vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDNS vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.38%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CDNS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

94.22

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

CDNS’s P/E Ratio of 94.22 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS

308.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 308.53, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDNS

18.73

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CDNS’s P/S Ratio of 18.73 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FIS

3.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDNS

16.81

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CDNS’s P/B Ratio of 16.81 is in the upper tier for the Software industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CDNS vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDNSFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)94.22308.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)18.733.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.813.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)60.1518.90