Seek Returns logo

CCL vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCL and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCLYUM
Company NameCarnival Corporation & plcYum! Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization41.54 billion USD40.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 24, 1987September 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCL and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCL vs. YUM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCLYUM
5-Day Price Return5.62%1.56%
13-Week Price Return38.45%-1.37%
26-Week Price Return11.66%0.54%
52-Week Price Return109.86%6.75%
Month-to-Date Return2.92%0.44%
Year-to-Date Return22.95%7.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume17.33M2.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume24.19M2.14M
3-Month Volatility40.49%20.23%
Beta2.720.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCL

27.27%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

CCL’s Return on Equity of 27.27% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

YUM

117.64%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCL

9.72%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

CCL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.72% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

YUM

18.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCL

15.19%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

CCL’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.19% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

YUM

30.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCLYUM
Return on Equity (TTM)27.27%117.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.09%21.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.72%18.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.19%30.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)53.90%46.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCL

0.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

CCL’s Current Ratio of 0.34 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

YUM

0.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCL

2.72

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

CCL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.72 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

YUM

30.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCL

2.15

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

CCL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.15 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

YUM

4.68

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCLYUM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.340.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.210.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.7230.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.154.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCL vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCL vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCL

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

YUM

1.91%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCL

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CCL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

YUM

53.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCLYUM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%53.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCL

15.52

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CCL’s P/E Ratio of 15.52 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

YUM

28.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.18 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCL

1.51

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

CCL’s P/S Ratio of 1.51 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

YUM

5.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.10 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCL

3.05

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

CCL’s P/B Ratio of 3.05 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

YUM

208.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CCL vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCLYUM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.5228.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.515.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.05208.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.9526.29