Seek Returns logo

CCK vs. SON: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCK and SON, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCKSON
Company NameCrown Holdings, Inc.Sonoco Products Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization11.97 billion USD4.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and SON by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. SON: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCKSON
5-Day Price Return2.04%1.50%
13-Week Price Return5.16%1.59%
26-Week Price Return17.72%-2.22%
52-Week Price Return20.13%-4.88%
Month-to-Date Return3.49%3.44%
Year-to-Date Return24.36%-4.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.17M0.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.23M0.87M
3-Month Volatility16.11%24.93%
Beta0.750.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SON

21.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SON’s Return on Equity of 21.31% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SON

8.35%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.35% places SON in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SON

5.65%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SON’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.65% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCKSON
Return on Equity (TTM)20.49%21.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.89%4.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.64%8.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.89%5.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.30%18.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SON

1.25

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SON’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SON

1.68

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SON’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SON

1.44

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.44 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCKSON
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.241.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.761.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. SON: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. SON: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.01%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SON

4.54%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.54%, SON offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SON

25.83%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SON’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.83% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCKSON
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.01%4.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.16%25.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SON

8.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

SON’s P/E Ratio of 8.15 is below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SON

0.68

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

SON’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SON

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SON’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CCK vs. SON: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Containers & Packaging industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCKSON
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.198.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.980.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.151.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.6010.22