Seek Returns logo

CCK vs. RL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCK and RL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCKRL
Company NameCrown Holdings, Inc.Ralph Lauren Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization11.97 billion USD18.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 12, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and RL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. RL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCKRL
5-Day Price Return2.04%6.64%
13-Week Price Return5.16%14.23%
26-Week Price Return17.72%10.62%
52-Week Price Return20.13%89.99%
Month-to-Date Return3.49%1.13%
Year-to-Date Return24.36%30.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.17M0.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.23M0.83M
3-Month Volatility16.11%30.39%
Beta0.751.65

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL

29.90%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 29.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RL

10.49%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RL

13.17%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.17% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCKRL
Return on Equity (TTM)20.49%29.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.89%10.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.64%10.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.89%13.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.30%68.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RL

1.78

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.78 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RL

0.54

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCKRL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.671.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.7685.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.01%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RL

1.10%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.10% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

RL

27.07%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.07% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCKRL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.01%1.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.16%27.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RL

24.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

RL’s P/E Ratio of 24.53 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RL

2.57

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RL

5.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

RL’s P/B Ratio of 5.27 is within the conventional range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCKRL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1924.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.982.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.155.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.6017.89