Seek Returns logo

CCK vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCK and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCKMGA
Company NameCrown Holdings, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization11.72 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCKMGA
5-Day Price Return-0.36%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return0.57%20.18%
26-Week Price Return13.91%10.53%
52-Week Price Return13.00%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return1.37%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return21.80%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.94M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.18M1.51M
3-Month Volatility16.40%27.61%
Beta0.751.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCKMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)20.49%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.89%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.64%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.89%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.30%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCKMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.768.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.02%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCKMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.02%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.16%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.03

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.03 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCKMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0310.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.980.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.150.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.526.83