CCK vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CCK and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
Company Name	Crown Holdings, Inc.	Mobileye Global Inc.
Country	United States	Israel
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Automobile Components
Market Capitalization	11.66 billion USD	11.24 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	October 26, 2022
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
5-Day Price Return	0.01%	-0.58%
13-Week Price Return	2.16%	-13.63%
26-Week Price Return	13.40%	-23.83%
52-Week Price Return	11.64%	-8.90%
Month-to-Date Return	0.85%	-3.02%
Year-to-Date Return	21.18%	-30.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.85M	3.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.18M	5.38M
3-Month Volatility	16.20%	51.23%
Beta	0.75	0.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.61%
Q3: 12.61%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 4.99%
Min: -4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 14.35%
Q3: 7.20%
Median: 5.37%
Q1: 2.20%
Min: -3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 18.98%
Q3: 10.24%
Median: 7.27%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: 0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.49%	-24.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.89%	-23.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.64%	-153.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.89%	-160.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	22.30%	48.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.63
Median: 0.37
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 88.53
Q3: 38.84
Median: 11.36
Q1: 5.08
Min: -21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.06	6.91
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.67	5.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.24	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.76	-4.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. MBLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.02%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 6.03%
Q3: 3.38%
Median: 2.62%
Q1: 1.38%
Min: 0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 95.56%
Q3: 55.95%
Median: 37.10%
Q1: 27.90%
Min: 0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.02%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	12.16%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.03

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.03 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MBLY

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 26.62
Q3: 17.42
Median: 13.22
Q1: 11.14
Min: 2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.38
Min: 0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.49
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	MBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.03	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.98	5.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.15	1.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.52	19.33