CCK vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at CCK and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Crown Holdings, Inc. | lululemon athletica inc. |
| Country | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods |
| Market Capitalization | 11.97 billion USD | 24.03 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 27, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of CCK and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 2.04% | 4.89% |
| 13-Week Price Return | 5.16% | -34.09% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 17.72% | -51.32% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 20.13% | -16.36% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 3.49% | -0.02% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 24.36% | -47.57% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 1.17M | 3.40M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 1.23M | 3.04M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 16.11% | 53.70% |
| Beta | 0.75 | 1.10 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
CCK
20.49%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 41.66%
- Q3
- 20.76%
- Median
- 14.35%
- Q1
- 6.55%
- Min
- 3.64%
CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
LULU
43.48%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 53.33%
- Q3
- 26.13%
- Median
- 18.47%
- Q1
- 7.99%
- Min
- -10.49%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
CCK
4.64%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 11.61%
- Q3
- 8.17%
- Median
- 4.91%
- Q1
- 4.20%
- Min
- 0.08%
CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
LULU
16.82%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 23.35%
- Q3
- 13.49%
- Median
- 8.45%
- Q1
- 4.18%
- Min
- -3.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
CCK
12.89%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 22.03%
- Q3
- 13.17%
- Median
- 8.87%
- Q1
- 6.86%
- Min
- 0.07%
CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
LULU
23.36%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 13.00%
- Q1
- 7.02%
- Min
- -3.59%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 20.49% | 43.48% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 3.89% | 25.05% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 4.64% | 16.82% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 12.89% | 23.36% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 22.30% | 59.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CCK
1.06
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 2.13
- Q3
- 1.57
- Median
- 1.27
- Q1
- 1.13
- Min
- 0.58
CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
LULU
2.28
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.49
- Median
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.80
LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
CCK
2.24
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 4.50
- Q3
- 2.23
- Median
- 1.22
- Q1
- 0.54
- Min
- 0.23
CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
LULU
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.67
- Q3
- 1.29
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
CCK
6.76
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 13.16
- Q3
- 8.10
- Median
- 3.61
- Q1
- 2.94
- Min
- 1.06
CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
LULU
-47.83
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 35.85
- Median
- 9.20
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- -32.49
LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.06 | 2.28 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 0.67 | 0.98 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 2.24 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.76 | -47.83 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CCK
1.01%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 7.37%
- Q3
- 4.07%
- Median
- 3.33%
- Q1
- 1.72%
- Min
- 0.00%
CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 3.60%
- Median
- 2.59%
- Q1
- 0.95%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CCK
12.16%
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 221.20%
- Q3
- 119.52%
- Median
- 58.05%
- Q1
- 28.91%
- Min
- 0.00%
CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
LULU
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 195.44%
- Q3
- 106.47%
- Median
- 58.77%
- Q1
- 36.52%
- Min
- 0.00%
LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 12.16% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
CCK
21.19
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 35.98
- Q3
- 27.87
- Median
- 16.15
- Q1
- 14.38
- Min
- 8.20
CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
LULU
13.38
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 63.29
- Q3
- 34.64
- Median
- 18.01
- Q1
- 13.88
- Min
- 6.04
In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
CCK
0.98
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 2.91
- Q3
- 1.67
- Median
- 0.83
- Q1
- 0.64
- Min
- 0.30
CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
LULU
2.25
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.46
- Q3
- 3.13
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
CCK
4.15
Containers & Packaging Industry
- Max
- 5.28
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.35
- Q1
- 1.57
- Min
- 0.89
CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
LULU
7.80
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.76
- Q3
- 6.00
- Median
- 3.26
- Q1
- 1.97
- Min
- 0.69
LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | CCK | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 21.19 | 13.38 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 2.25 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 4.15 | 7.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 11.60 | 15.24 |