CCK vs. LEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CCK and LEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CCK	LEN
Company Name	Crown Holdings, Inc.	Lennar Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	11.97 billion USD	33.74 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and LEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. LEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	LEN
5-Day Price Return	2.04%	9.52%
13-Week Price Return	5.16%	16.30%
26-Week Price Return	17.72%	2.86%
52-Week Price Return	20.13%	-18.89%
Month-to-Date Return	3.49%	16.68%
Year-to-Date Return	24.36%	-0.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.17M	2.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.23M	3.03M
3-Month Volatility	16.11%	39.07%
Beta	0.75	1.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 41.66%
Q3: 20.76%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 6.55%
Min: 3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 11.61%
Q3: 8.17%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 4.20%
Min: 0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.17%
Median: 8.87%
Q1: 6.86%
Min: 0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	LEN
Return on Equity (TTM)	20.49%	12.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.89%	8.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.64%	9.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.89%	12.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	22.30%	13.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.13
Q3: 1.57
Median: 1.27
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.50
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.22
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.94
Min: 1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	LEN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.06	7.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.67	1.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.24	0.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	6.76	11.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.01%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.37%
Q3: 4.07%
Median: 3.33%
Q1: 1.72%
Min: 0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LEN

1.60%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 221.20%
Q3: 119.52%
Median: 58.05%
Q1: 28.91%
Min: 0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	LEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.01%	1.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	12.16%	16.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 35.98
Q3: 27.87
Median: 16.15
Q1: 14.38
Min: 8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN

10.31

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.31 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 2.91
Q3: 1.67
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.64
Min: 0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN

0.95

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 5.28
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.57
Min: 0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CCK	LEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.19	10.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.98	0.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.15	1.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.60	15.05