Seek Returns logo

CCK vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCK and FLUT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCKFLUT
Company NameCrown Holdings, Inc.Flutter Entertainment plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization11.97 billion USD51.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 4, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and FLUT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. FLUT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCKFLUT
5-Day Price Return2.04%-4.04%
13-Week Price Return5.16%18.80%
26-Week Price Return17.72%10.37%
52-Week Price Return20.13%55.99%
Month-to-Date Return3.49%-2.83%
Year-to-Date Return24.36%13.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.17M2.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.23M2.55M
3-Month Volatility16.11%32.59%
Beta0.751.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

20.49%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

CCK’s Return on Equity of 20.49% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLUT

5.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 5.32% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

4.64%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT

3.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.89%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.89% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLUT

6.71%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.71% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCKFLUT
Return on Equity (TTM)20.49%5.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.89%2.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.64%3.65%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.89%6.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.30%47.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.06

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.24

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FLUT

0.69

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCKFLUT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.060.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.670.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.240.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.761.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.01%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.16%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.16% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCKFLUT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.01%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.16%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

21.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

CCK’s P/E Ratio of 21.19 is within the middle range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT

99.19

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

At 99.19, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.98

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT

3.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

4.15

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLUT

3.98

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 3.98 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCK vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCKFLUT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1999.19
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.983.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.153.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.6061.35