Seek Returns logo

CCK vs. DECK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCK and DECK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCKDECK
Company NameCrown Holdings, Inc.Deckers Outdoor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryContainers & PackagingTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization11.18 billion USD12.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 15, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCK and DECK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCK vs. DECK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCKDECK
5-Day Price Return-2.03%3.73%
13-Week Price Return-3.40%-19.56%
26-Week Price Return-0.30%-35.98%
52-Week Price Return5.30%-53.56%
Month-to-Date Return-0.04%1.62%
Year-to-Date Return17.47%-59.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M3.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.35M3.79M
3-Month Volatility26.36%47.28%
Beta0.751.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCK

33.32%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, CCK’s Return on Equity of 33.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DECK

40.32%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

7.79%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

CCK’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DECK

19.37%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.37% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCK

12.59%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

CCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.59% is around the midpoint for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DECK

23.51%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.51% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCKDECK
Return on Equity (TTM)33.32%40.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.67%26.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.79%19.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.59%23.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)22.34%57.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

1.16

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

CCK’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK

3.07

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

DECK’s Current Ratio of 3.07 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

2.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

CCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Containers & Packaging industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCK

6.76

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

CCK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCKDECK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.163.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.732.15
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.120.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.76713.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCK vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCK vs. DECK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCK

1.06%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Yield of 1.06% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCK

12.58%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

CCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.58% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCKDECK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.06%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)12.58%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCK

11.84

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, CCK’s P/E Ratio of 11.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DECK

11.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s P/E Ratio of 11.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCK

0.92

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

CCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCK

3.73

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

CCK’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DECK

6.10

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CCK vs. DECK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Containers & Packaging and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCKDECK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.8411.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.922.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.736.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.9111.14