Seek Returns

CCJ vs. TS: Cameco vs. Tenaris Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CCJ is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while TS is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Cameco (CCJ) trades as ordinary local shares, while Tenaris (TS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
Profile ItemCCJTS
NameCameco CorporationTenaris S.A. American Depositary Shares
Country/RegionCanadaLuxembourg
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD29.71 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
TS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%49.29%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%24.84%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%22.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
TS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%29.07%
Beta (5Y)1.180.88
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-33.71%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M1.24M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and TS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.461.55
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.642.30

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and Tenaris (TS) at 11.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

TS

Energy industry group

11.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
TS
11.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Tenaris (TS) at 16.24% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

TS

Energy industry group

16.24%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
TS
16.24%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Tenaris (TS) at 19.26% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

TS

Energy industry group

19.26%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
TS
19.26%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
ROE (TTM)5.68%11.86%
ROA (TTM)2.79%6.69%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%16.24%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%19.26%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%38.54%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and Tenaris (TS) at -4.33% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Tenaris (TS) at 1.11%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%-4.33%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%0.62%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%1.11%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-5.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 and Tenaris (TS) at 3.25 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

TS

Energy industry group

3.25

Max
3.64
TS
3.25
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 and Tenaris (TS) at 0.03 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

TS

Energy industry group

0.03

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
TS
0.03
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.553.25
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.03
Net Debt / EBITDA0.19-0.90

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Tenaris (TS) at 2.11% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TS

Energy industry group

2.11%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
TS
2.11%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Tenaris (TS) at 45.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TS

Energy industry group

45.64%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
TS
45.64%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%2.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%45.64%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Tenaris (TS) at 15.09 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

TS

Energy industry group

15.09

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
TS
15.09
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Tenaris (TS) at 2.44 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

TS

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
TS
2.44
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Tenaris (TS) at 3.53 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

TS

Energy industry group

3.53

Max
4.21
TS
3.53
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Tenaris (TS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Tenaris (TS)
MetricCCJTS
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0315.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.932.44
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.033.53
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%6.50%