Seek Returns logo

CCJ vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCJ and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CCJ is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCCJTS
Company NameCameco CorporationTenaris S.A.
CountryCanadaLuxembourg
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization36.67 billion USD21.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCJ and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCJ vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCJTS
5-Day Price Return-10.06%-2.21%
13-Week Price Return12.12%12.65%
26-Week Price Return63.13%14.83%
52-Week Price Return59.98%-0.54%
Month-to-Date Return-17.07%1.21%
Year-to-Date Return64.93%-3.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.90M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.95M1.84M
3-Month Volatility66.26%25.01%
Beta1.061.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCJ

7.98%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

CCJ’s Return on Equity of 7.98% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TS

11.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.69%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.04%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.87% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCJ

15.18%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

CCJ’s Net Profit Margin of 15.18% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TS

16.91%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.51%
Q3
8.94%
Median
5.91%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-2.81%

TS’s Net Profit Margin of 16.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCJ

18.07%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

CCJ’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.07% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TS

19.34%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.80%
Q3
17.55%
Median
11.05%
Q1
4.67%
Min
-1.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.34% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCJTS
Return on Equity (TTM)7.98%11.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.45%9.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.18%16.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.07%19.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.34%34.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

2.99

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

CCJ’s Current Ratio of 2.99 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TS

4.08

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
2.08
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.70

TS’s Current Ratio of 4.08 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

0.15

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.06
Median
0.48
Q1
0.33
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

2.29

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.29 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
27.00
Median
9.96
Q1
2.52
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCJTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.994.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.572.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.29101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCJ vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCJ vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCJ

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

CCJ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TS

4.11%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.69%
Q3
4.11%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.24%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Yield of 4.11% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

51.41%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

CCJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.41% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
97.80%
Median
44.61%
Q1
15.01%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCJTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)51.41%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

97.48

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

At 97.48, CCJ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TS

10.95

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
26.39
Q3
20.56
Median
14.49
Q1
10.91
Min
7.44

TS’s P/E Ratio of 10.95 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

14.80

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

With a P/S Ratio of 14.80, CCJ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TS

1.85

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.59
Median
0.89
Q1
0.57
Min
0.20

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.85 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

7.55

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

At 7.55, CCJ’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TS

1.11

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.69
Median
1.77
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.11 is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CCJ vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCJTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)97.4810.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)14.801.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.551.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.7213.42